If you can move a critique of the multiplex, is to be "urticatamente" commercial. Unlike the good old single room, which required a prior choice, these modern "supermarket of cinema, super-equipped, with dozens of rooms, receive more customers attracted by the pomp and the occasional tendency of the place more than a passion for cinema , choosing a random movies attracted by the poster. Clear that not all correspond to the profile mentioned above and that all who can to survive the industry of art are welcome, but if you go to the cinema at least do not complain loudly throughout the film (if, moreover, perhaps your last saw was a cine film panettone) criticizing the quality just because you are not informed in any way on it, or because it was not like you expected. If you read "Thriller" on the promotional poster, know that this is just putting a rating them for the archives, because there are directors who are just there to be locked into a genre. If you then go see a movie like The Black Swan , rehabilitation and modern on the big screen of the Swan Lake means something to document there. And to think that in the movie the director deliberately inserts a scene where the protagonist explains in general terms the work to two youngsters disco unfamiliar and operetta. You're not there yet? it is a tragedy! So why still hope out loud: "We hope it ends well." Ah, yeah! but you were not there for the thriller, but because there was "dancing". I did this deliberately
initial digression, and for that outlet to get their hands on. In fact I had read comments on the web of people who had the same thing happened, but after the first time I'd be more inclined to give reason to the detractors. Maybe because I do not like the dance and that bores me the stories we go around, it will be a thriller that, until the interval, needless to talk about it, but I know that after the first time I'd come out of room on the sly. A simple story of dance? Rationality required cold blood, and my maxim that "no film can be judged only after it's over" could not be ignored. In fact, after a few minutes later, I find that until then had aired only white swan and the metamorphosis of the same in the psychological thriller the black swan was in place. Here is the canvas color and the psychology of the character reveals his "crack" (as poster). Excessive stress of a life dedicated to perfection and sacrifice will bring the player to come out ... out of the track. The metamorphosis is complete and reflects both in character as the film genre. The visionary paranoia of the second half as it approaches its previous works ( π - The theorem of delirium ) with sequences that result in soft and splatter that closely resemble Cronenberg's The Fly. Then when it all ends with a rare and desired fade to white, with a view you're almost to revalue the first part. The two sides in fact, they can make up their noses at two different audiences in a relatively negative, they are perfectly functional one another like two sides of the same coin, like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide.
Darren Aronofsky so we pack a movie bigusto, well-engineered to the point of deceiving us and wink to the living rooms dell'Accademy and receive five Oscar nominations in 2011. Genius? is not the case of unbalance, but we see that the young man has talent. The film in fact, even if it is an absolute masterpiece, it's really well done. Maybe not enough to justify any Oscars (this year in my preferences there is a certain Inception) but are really enjoyable to assembly and photography. Surely it is a film that increases its revised once because, for the reasons mentioned above, which makes it a gem not just for longevity.
rating: 8
0 comments:
Post a Comment